Encoding interference effects support self-organized sentence processing

نویسندگان

چکیده

• Cue-based retrieval cannot explain encoding interference in sentence processing. An extension to cue-based can do so, and it makes reading time predictions. A self-organization-based model diverging Two self-paced experiments provide support for self-organization. According theories of comprehension, establishing the syntactic dependency between a verb grammatical subject is susceptible from other noun phrases sentence. At verb, must be retrieved memory, but non-subject nouns that are similar on dimensions relevant subject-verb agreement, like number marking, make more difficult. However, models fail account class effects, conventionally called “encoding interference,” due interference. In this paper, we implement self-organized processing provides parsimonious explanation effects than otherwise reasonable extensions could made approach. We first also present new behavioral evidence using semantic similarity manipulation two studies agreement. The results these compatible with self-organizing account. argue self-organization, which reduces all parsing fallible feature match optimization no priori distinction retrieval, unifying approach similarity-based comprehension.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects.

Dynamical, self-organizing models of sentence processing predict "digging-in" effects: The more committed the parser becomes to a wrong syntactic choice, the harder it is to reanalyze. Experiment 1 replicates previous grammaticality judgment studies (F. Ferreira & J. M. Henderson, 1991b, 1993), revealing a deleterious effect of lengthening the ambiguous region of a garden-path sentence. The aut...

متن کامل

Evidence for Self-Organized Sentence Processing: Local Coherence Effects

A central question for psycholinguistics concerns the role of grammatical constraints in online sentence processing. Many current theories maintain that, at each point in time, the processor constructs an analysis which is consistent with the grammatical information in the input. Several bottom-up, dynamical models make a contrasting prediction: partial parses which are syntactically incompatib...

متن کامل

Lexical interference effects in sentence processing: evidence from the visual world paradigm and self-organizing models.

Psycholinguistic research spanning a number of decades has produced diverging results with regard to the nature of constraint integration in online sentence processing. For example, evidence that language users anticipatorily fixate likely upcoming referents in advance of evidence in the speech signal supports rapid context integration. By contrast, evidence that language users activate represe...

متن کامل

Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.

Evidence from 3 experiments reveals interference effects from structural relationships that are inconsistent with any grammatical parse of the perceived input. Processing disruption was observed when items occurring between a head and a dependent overlapped with either (or both) syntactic or semantic features of the dependent. Effects of syntactic interference occur in the earliest online measu...

متن کامل

Does number interference occur during sentence processing?

Models of interference in sentence processing claim that object relative clauses are harder to process than subject relatives due to interference between the subject and object noun phrase. The interference effect for object relatives at the verb should be more pronounced when the two noun phrases retrieved from memory are similar. To test this, two eye tracking experiments manipulated whether ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Cognitive Psychology

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1095-5623', '0010-0285']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101356